Author: EAB

  • What holds

    Weird, isn’t it? I’ve been cycling through the Kubler-Ross stages of grief in a way that is both familiar to the human experience and foreign, as a pandemic of this magnitude is beyond the life experience of most living things on this planet, save some ancient trees and ecosystems. Mostly I’ve settled into the necessity of acceptance, which is doing whatever I can to ensure that I keep my family and myself safe because we are at the point here in NYC where the hospitals are overrun, and should an asthmatic like me—even if active and healthy—needs a ventilator, one might not be available. 

    We had some warning here, mostly through paying attention to our friends in Europe. In the weeks before, we’d thought to stock a couple of weeks’ groceries in case of a quarantine, and my husband, a cyclist down to the cellular level, had noticed a steep increase in other bikes during his commute to and from work. But we hadn’t yet thought to worry or panic. 

    The morning of Monday, March 9th, I woke up to things still feeling very normal yet shifting rapidly: I read an advisory from our local councilman advising us to avoid public transit. So my 3 year old and I walked to her art class rather than take the train, and when we picked up my 4.5 year old from school, we drove rather than take the bus to the girls’ soccer practice. 

    On Tuesday the babysitter called out sick, just in case. The 3 year old and I went for a run through Prospect Park, and I recoiled at every runner who spat carelessly. Later that day, NYC Half was canceled, a race that I had worked to gain entry to all last year, yet I was filled with relief, as I’d found no justification able to dissolve my revulsion to the other unhygienic runners I’d seen earlier in the day and had hoped for its cancelation. 

    Public school Pre-K kids had no school on Wednesday, and that morning the anxiety was beginning to settle in. My daughters and I went to the music class they’d been attending since infancy, and their teacher was so worried about being a transmission vector that the parents and nannies thoroughly sanitized the giant sacks of percussives used during the class. Afterwards each family patiently waited their turn to wash their hands before leaving, 20 seconds, no less, more if desired. 

    My older kid went back to school on Thursday, and I spoke with her teacher briefly at drop off, each of us lamenting octogenarian parents who refused to curtail their daily routines. The babysitter showed up at her usual time, and I went for the last run I’ll go on for a while, with my sweet pooch functioning as a social-distancing tactic. When I came home, the babysitter and I discussed how we’d pay her expected wages if we ended up quarantined. 

    Then that night, as my husband and I absorbed the news of the world around us, we realized that we shouldn’t—no, we couldn’t—send our preschooler to school the next day. As the early stages of grief were creeping in then, my instinct was to deny, to question, to justify. But we weren’t overreacting. This was the right move. 

    I woke up early Friday, went to the grocery store for the things we urgently needed, and washed my hands several times upon arriving and unpacking. Our friends were keeping their son home, too, so they suggested we drop off the 4.5 year old for a play date in the afternoon. We kept the appointment, and my friends and I spoke with disbelief, with rising fear, over what was happening: no hugs, no contact, just words colored with disbelief and well wishes. I went to the backyard, rid it of winter’s neglect, and established a space for the girls to play for whatever days and weeks would come. Then the younger kid and I picked up the older one from her play date, and we drove home in curiously minimal traffic with the world looking entirely normal yet feeling vulnerable, fragile.

    We stayed home Saturday, then Sunday, only ever leaving to walk the dog, and then, only at a great distance from people, and the girls have only been to the backyard since. By Sunday night, school was canceled through spring break, and now we’re inside. 

    Our days are now characterized by homogeneity as necessity. Children rely on routines for safety, so we’ve stuck to breakfast, lunch, naps and rest, dinner, bath, and bedtime at more or less their usual times. The days in which we’ve deviated have resulted in more tantrums and tears than anyone has emotional space for. My older daughter has stopped asking when we’re going out, mostly due to frank conversations bolstered by Zoom sessions with her well-meaning teachers, who are all doing their best to tape the pieces together. She plays games with her sister in which she intones coronavirus—a word too heavy for her mouth—and every time, something in me shatters. 

    We get groceries delivered once weekly, placing the order a week in advance without the possibility of modification, lest our order feature omissions we’d rather not entertain, and we’ve maxed out our meal-kit service’s order options to facilitate access to perishables. I’ve placed a stash of neck gaiters by the door previously used for winter workouts that are now meant to cover our faces whenever we have to go out. We started wearing them on the 18th, when few others were masked, and now, most of the people we see outdoors have their faces masked as well. Whereas we began staying in as a practice to shield anyone from any potential contagion we might spread based on the encounters in our lives in the great before, now it is to avoid being part of the catastrophic wave that is crushing the health care system here.

    I stopped walking the dog a week ago, but before that, I had stuck to our three-times-daily schedule with a pit stop to the curb before bed. While the fresh air would seem welcome, the practice was a horrifying survivalist game in which maintaining the 6-foot safe distance often meant walking in the street. I was reaching the end of my tolerance when I collapsed into an anxiety attack on Saturday, March 21st: from across the street, I witnessed a young woman leaning into a car speaking to people, and when she they left, she coughed into her hand four times, then employed the same hand to open the door to her apartment building. My neurons caught fire calculating the number of infections that singular action could cause were she infected, and I couldn’t breathe. The next day, I created an area in the backyard for the dog to use for elimination purposes, away from where the kids play. Luckily the pooch adapted quickly, and now the only reason to go outside is to collect mail and packages and take out the trash. 

    The germination of grief means that you cannot accurately gauge a situation: your judgment is fundamentally altered because you cannot apply obsolete standards to a broken and incomplete whole, regardless of how seemingly incomplete it had been before. A void has opened up, and it must be acknowledged, salved, and healed, if ever. It’s still too soon to tell what is bruise and what will become lasting scar, but such determinations are as speculative as when it will be safe to go outdoors without fear or anxiety, when it will once again be a delight to sit next to a friend and laugh without worry.  

    We are grieving, and we are careful. We are grateful for what we have, and even though at times it feels as though the center is collapsing, we will persist. 

    Love, EACdB

  • More or less…

    As of today, April 15th, there are only forty days left to May 25th, my due date, or the metric by which all my medical caregivers concur that my daughter will be fully developed and ready to take her first independent breath… give or take a few days. We can only be so precise when it comes to the business of babies, in which all processes seem to be dictated by a brand of quantum uncertainty, leading me to idly muse if quantum uncertainty applies macrocosmically to all tiny, promising things.

    Forty days—and more specifically, forty days and nights—is a curious phrase and is actually not meant to be taken literally. The number forty has various mystical connotations in Semitic cultures, which is why it appears so frequently within texts originating from the Middle East. It’s a number that indicates significant substance when applied to mundane, concrete things, for its true connotation is meant to be applied symbolically so that it’s a kin of own English idiom a lot. If you doubt this, you’ve never been the only adult in a room with about forty teenagers, or had to scale wall that’s about forty feet tall, or had to figure out how you could possibly transport an order of approximately forty customized coffees from Starbucks. So when you’re reading The Arabian Nights—all 1,001 of them, a larger numerical idiom from the culture that gave us Algebra—Ali Baba didn’t cross forty thieves, but he crossed a lot of them, which most would agree is more than he would have ever wanted after him and far more than enough to be very, very worried about his health.

    What I can report about my own health is that while I have received clean marks from all the midwives, I have indeed reached the point in my pregnancy in which I’m weary of the nipping exhaustion, the utter failure of sophisticated mental and physical dexterity, the inability to breathe deeply, the persistent ache that tends to tap you on the shoulder when your attentions have been drawn to another ache somewhere on your person. Part of me is ready to reclaim my body as my own, but on the other hand, I am so grateful for and in love with all the biological cues my daughter gives me regularly—from peanut butter cravings to raging thirst—that I will miss them dearly when I can’t meet her needs telepathically and so immediately.

    Nevertheless, forty days remain until that magical date arrives. Yet as I have no idea when my body and my daughter’s body will work together to make her birth possible, forty days to me is as nebulous as the Semitic idiom. However, I cannot delude myself into thinking that I have a lot of time between now and then.

    Until later, whenever that is.

    If you’d like to read more about the symbolism behind forty, click here.

    ♥ EAB

    P.S. For those of you who don’t have a looming date ahead, that May 25th is forty days off also means that there are thirty-eight days left until Memorial Day/Bank Holiday weekend in the US and UK. It’s also exactly forty-three days to Manhattanhenge, and not much longer to many other summery things. Now that you have been warned, you have ample time to wash those white pants you’ve been storing in the closet since September. Cheers!

  • (Im)Balance

    I have been trying—and not very hard, I might add—to pick up the pen again.

    It’s not been easy. Mostly because I’ve been trying to write and not actually writing.

    My problem isn’t rooted in anything as mundane or purely fictitious as writer’s block. I don’t believe in Writer’s Block. (Phillip Pullman once said at a lecture in Oxford that one would never walk into A&E with a broken arm and allow the doctors to say, “I’m sorry I can’t help you—I have doctor’s block.” The same should and does apply to writers.) I’ve just allowed life to get so stupendously in the way that, in the whirlwind of the last nine months, I’ve simply gotten out of the habit of stringing together words for poetic and/or narrative purposes.

    It doesn’t take much to define a habit. You only need to repeat the same action for a few days in a row for the seed to settle and then stick with it when it takes root. It really is that easy.

    However, I will concede that the inner conversation that must occur to establish a habit is not always easy. Encouraging yourself to eat chocolate-covered bananas daily is much more easily established than demonstrating the discipline to wake up 45 minutes earlier everyday to exercise, and when exhaustion and other day-to-day life complications step in and demand your attention, it’s far too easy to chuck an inner mandate for exercise out the window in favor of the immediate gratification of the head against the pillow.

    I’m rubbish at blog promises, so I won’t lie to any of us with pledges to keep up this page or get back to Project X, Y or Z, or even so much as knock out a haiku. I will, however, at this point, admit that I miss writing terribly. While I couldn’t be happier with the state of my life at the moment, there is part of me that is nostalgically appreciative of the body of work that poured out of me during that incredibly fecund period of mid-2009 through early-2013: the completion of a 65,000-word novel for literary fiction types, a young adult trilogy with supporting apocryphal stories amounting to about 350,000 words, a feature-length screenplay drafted and redrafted an unmerciful number of times over half a year, a couple of embryonic graphic novel scripts, several short stories, dozens of poems, a blog about a job I had, and several rants, some of which I kept to myself and others I shared. I was solely preoccupied with writing for a few years, and while they were undoubtedly defining and still whisper to me, I haven’t quite figured out how to develop the habit of bringing them back into my life with any measure of regularity. Balance is something I admire but don’t understand, as my soul tends to jump on one side or the other of the scale’s platform until it crashes to the ground and leaves its sister dangling high above it. But I can work towards understanding and incorporating it into my life.

    In the meantime, there are a few posts I tossed up late last year/early this year on a Tumblr blog called Presently Transforming that I was purposely keeping quiet at the time. They’re the only things I’ve written with any sincerity in a while, and I don’t mind sharing right now.

    Tea Leaves
    Malt Vinegar
    Architecture
    Resolve
    Quickening

    I want to and will come back to these projects I have occupying burners in the back of my skull, but I’m also realistic to admit that with some of the smaller ones (and Ministers of Grace is not small), I might not. I do know that writing is in my blood, to the extent that it seeps out of my breath and adds contour and color to all my thoughts, so there’s no way I could truly walk away from it. But as in the past, in years prior to my most productive years, there were times when I had to take the time when it was offered to me—a week here, a house-bound month there—and write much as I could with the days I’d had. I might have to do that again. Or I might develop a more balanced manner of discipline and work everyday to a larger goal.

    I don’t know. We’ll see.

    But for now, it was damn nice to write something today.

    ♥ EAB

  • 20/20

    Ultimately, the goal is to get something done, if only to put down something after a life-rrrreally-got-in-the-way hiatus.

    10-line, 11-syllable terza rima, here:

    20/20.

    You are more than this gradual expansion,
    more than the taut lengthening of the tendons,
    or shifts in the centers of gravitation.

    All systems are preoccupied with functions
    in constructing your channels, your inner sparks,
    synthesis of tissues, each in cohesion.

    Quickening in the blood, of sinewed bulwarks
    detecting your subtle movements in rapport
    with stippling sensations and bright and bowed arcs,

    you’re a celebration I’ve always hoped for.

    ♥ & damn glad to be back,
    EAB

  • Frayed Knots

    I really really really really really had to put something down on a page today. It’s an 11 x 17 in a stupendously early draft form, but it dissolved some of the cobwebs in my brain, making this post altogether worth it. ♥ EAB

    Fear

    From the tiny, perhaps trivial – wasp wings
    and spidery spites – to the monolithic,
    maybe the mundane – losing one’s liberty
    and everlasting loneliness – they become
    crystalline within, although colorless and
    oftentimes odorless, stacking one reason
    for failure on top of another like a
    losing hand of playing cards. They are the sharp
    somethings that can’t be seen or touched and yet are
    cradled in the folds of the brain, molecules
    that glide over the membranes in the way that
    sunlight slides over the synaptic windows
    of the skyline at dawn. Glass reinterprets
    the light for the sheltered: it’s never as bright
    as it is – heaven and hell always exist
    beyond silicate structures – for perception
    is never the reality, isn’t it?

  • Rebirth of the Spool + Need(lework)

    Since my lifepace switch got stuck in turbo mode a while back, it’s been harder than differential calculus to find the time to sort out the transfer of my web host and domains to a new one that doesn’t get hacked every thirty seconds. A couple of weeks ago, however, I had no choice but to sort it all out, so after a few months of being down, this site is finally back up, running with a new template in place to spool out new work. Huzzah!

    I miss writing. I miss traversing the bioluminescent pathways of plotting, I miss the willowy decision trees of redrafting, and I miss employing the eagle-eyed and steady-handed scalpel work of editing. (How soon is November?)

    In the meantime, here’s a sevenlingish thing I needed to wring out of my fingertips, just so I can say I’ve written something this week.

    Need(lework)
    Twist the splinter and hold it
    up to the light: you will see
    the osteological
    anomaly, the gap where
    the genetics disagreed,
    leaving a tidy hole for
    a whetted wick of thread.

    ♥ EAB

  • (a sunflower by any other name)

    I’m getting married in October, and among the millions of decisions I have to make between now and the hour of my wedding, I also have to make a decision about whether to change my name.

    ::siiiiiigh::

    I’m a self-identifying feminist—and a vitriol-spitting, fire-breathing one of late, given this Hobby Lobby disgrace—and I have never wanted to change my name. It was what I was born with, I’ve carried it around with me for almost thirty-eight years, and it suits me: Estelle Ana Baca.

    I already navigate a steady stream of appellation ambiguity. First of all, my name at birth was Estelle Anne Baca, but my dad wanted to call me Ana, thus initiating the childhood ritual of correcting everyone who saw my legal name and addressed me by names that seemed too mature (Estelle) and too pristine (Anne) for my childhood spirit (Ana). Consequently, everyone I met before I reached age 21 knows me as Ana.

    When I moved to New York at 21, I wondered what it would be like if I stopped correcting everyone when they inspected my IDs. I felt like a grown woman, which meant I finally felt powerful enough to carry around the weight of an unusual, old name, and I started introducing myself to people as Estelle. And always Estelle, never Stella—my aunt’s variant, plus I grooooan at Streetcar exhortations—and never Estella—that Dickensian form belonged to my grandmother and not me. Just Estelle, as Sartre preferred it.

    Therefore, in most circumstances I cling to my full name as I have come to embrace it: Estelle Ana Baca. I identify as Estelle and as Ana. I answer to both. I refer to myself as both, and while I really have no preference, I do mandate that if given a choice when meeting me, that acquaintances subsequently refer to me as the name with which I introduced myself. See, Ana-people switching to Estelle-people makes it too tough for me to keep straight, and I look like an idiot when it looks like I don’t know my own name.

    I’ve never been the kind of woman who idly perused wedding magazines to find the perfect dress before I even had landed the perfect man, or who knew the carat size of the diamond she was going to have on her engagement ring—and for the record, J gave me a pale green sapphire—and so the thought of testing out my name with someone else’s surname appended to Estelle Ana always sounded absurd. My name is my name. Even when faced with the same situation years ago, I never changed my name. Why would I?

    Life, however, has a sense of humor, and in the way that some people port around with them an air of nonchalance or a rapier-sharp wit, I have a knack for attracting unusual circumstances that require verbose explanations whenever possible. My husband-to-be’s surname is C de Baca, which is a contraction of Cabeza de Baca, meaning head of the cow. (And yes, you’ve teased it out correctly, my surname means cow in old Spanish.) Unless you’re from New Mexico, you’ve probably never heard of such a name. Many assume that the C is a middle initial and incorrectly prune it down to de Baca, which is as much of misnomer as referring to him as my leaner, meaner, all-inclusive-eyeballs-to-entrails-of-the-whole-cow Baca. He is constantly and ever explaining his name to anyone and everyone who isn’t from New Mexico.

    Since we started dating, people outside of our home state of New Mexico started wondering if we were already married—Wow, that was quick!—or if we were related—Game of Thrones is fiction, thank you!—based upon the similarity of our surnames. In fact, many remarked, “At least you don’t have to change your name if you two get married!”

    But here we are, and there is a decision to be made because my fiancé would really prefer it if I took his name after we’re married.

    JMC: Why be the whole cow when you can be just the head?
    EAB: But if it’s got only the head, it’s got no heart. And no spine and no guts and no asshole, and they’re important, too.

    Yes, our conversations have actually included the above dialogue in our negotiation. Part of it is silliness, but it’s also because we’re dealing with an all-or-nothing type situation. Given the nature of our similar surnames, it’s hard to find a compromise. We can’t really hyphenate. In fact, utilizing traditional Spanish naming customs, my surname becomes a curiously palindromic Baca (Sánchez) de C de Baca, and any future offspring’s apellidos are C de Baca Baca, which sounds undoubtedly redundant. I have a hard enough time with my first names that introducing a stutter feels masochistic. I’ve suggested that perhaps we both change our names to de Baca, which my husband-to-be perceives as a genealogic decapitation.

    I’ve asked a few women who changed their name after marriage, and the answer is typically rooted in instilling a sense of family unity. My bridesmaid of honor recounted that her chain of reason for taking her husband’s surname culminated in the notion that she wanted for them to have a common appellation, like a team name, that they both could get behind. I can’t argue with that at all. It makes sense to me to have a family name. I fully promote the idea of our children taking their father’s full surname regardless of my own surname.

    From my own perspective, the sense of family unity is already built-in when given the widespread assumption afforded by our similar surnames, but my groom doesn’t see it that way. His name is frequently mutilated when folks aim for consistency and opt for Baca over C de Baca. Just as I am sensitive to the fact that my name is my name as it is, and stripping me of Ana is just as insufferable as is stripping me of Estelle, so I can see why one might lose their head over such repeated confusion.

    As for my issues with changing my name, most of them are rooted in the notion that I disagree with the assumption that I should be the only one who should consider it. We live in a society that is patently patriarchal despite our efforts, so of course it still falls upon the purported mutability of women to alter their monograms after marriage. I’ve never really been warm to the idea of hyphenation because they generally feel clunky, and many of the women of my generation who grew up with hyphenated names were quick to dispose of them when they got married. And as for clunky names, one of the reasons I am still unconvinced about changing my name is that Estelle Ana C de Baca has so many pieces that it reads more like an encoded pentatonic musical scale than a monogram.

    Therefore, dear friends, what does one do? Your advice is appreciated. Do I hold fast to my convictions, or do I sentence myself to still more explanation when it comes to the nature of my name? What would you do if you were in my shoes?

    UPDATE! July 8, 2014, 10:52 am EDT

    Since I wrote this yesterday and opened it up to discussion here and on Facebook, I’ve gathered some fantastic great perspectives from married (and sometimes divorced) friends who have had to make a choice. In writing about it and discussing it, I’ve come to realize that it’s not so much my surname that I’m connected to but more my given names than anything else, and opting for one or the other to complement a complicated surname is what gives me pause. No matter how you look at it, the pentagonal, agglutinating structure of EACdb is a mouthful, esp. when I’ve embraced the wobbly simplicity of EAB over the last thirty-eight years.

    This thread also sparked a few private conversations in regard to family legacy. Baca isn’t a common name, but C de Baca doesn’t even register in databases on account of its rarity. That in itself is a huge argument for its preservation and promotion.

    Yet, while it doesn’t seem like a big deal to just add C de to my existing surname, it is. Think of how different theism becomes when you add the a- and transform it into atheism.

    Nevertheless, transformation isn’t something to be feared if it yields an improvement.

    …right?

  • The First Year!

    Ministers of Grace: Cherubim & Seraphim was released one year ago today! If you still haven’t read it, check it out here.

  • You can’t really plan life, can you?

    The man I love and with whom I intend to spend the rest of my life formally asked me to marry him last Saturday night (6/14). Yet even though I knew that day was coming—we’d been discussing it for weeks, and we even chose my engagement ring together—I hadn’t fully anticipated what would come next: the flurry of correspondence with everyone in our lives, the wedding planning, and also a permeating desire to bask in the glow of a celebratory occasion, time permitting. Consequently last Sunday, I had a choice awaiting me: spend the day with my fiancé or set up in my bedroom with a cup of tea and knock out Chapter 8 of Book 2. There was no contest, really. I mean, I’m never getting engaged again, am I? I’ll never have that sun-filled day after again, whereas there’s a Sunday evening somewhere not too far away where I can lock myself in the bedroom and redraft 4,000 words at lightning speed.

    A halcyon glow is illuminating all the days ahead until our big day, which we’re hoping will be in October of this year, and to get it done, there is an unfortunate lack of time for much else. I’ve had barely the occasion to sit down and reply to emails from kind folks wishing us well, let alone the chance to put my brain to the task of refining prose. This blog post alone is writ by means of putting a second mortgage against borrowed time, and I still have a fields and fields worth of matters to see to before my eyes find their nightly rest tonight.

    While I hate to announce it, the serialized release of Book 2 is now on hiatus until November at the soonest. Thank you to all of you who have been faithfully reading the new chapters as I’ve put them out, because you’re the reason I’m still doing this. (If you’re totally desperate to keep reading, I might be convinced to share with you the rest of the book, but that invitation is issued with a caveat that you’re reading an unrefined book that is subject to vast changes in the chapters ahead, so you really are better off to wait at this point.)

    When I started planning this back in March, I had no idea that I’d be planning a wedding in June. You can’t really plan life, can you?

    Thank you again for your understanding, and I’ll do my best to stop back here over the next few months and drop off some prose/poetry whenever I can.

    ♥ EAB

error: Content is protected !!